ctrl+shift+p filters: :st2 :st3 :win :osx :linux
Browse

IDL-Syntax

by andik ST2/ST3

simple IDL (Microsoft midl, Mozilla WebIDL) syntax highlighting for Sublime Text

Details

Installs

  • Total 2K
  • Win 624
  • OS X 580
  • Linux 411
Feb 22 Feb 21 Feb 20 Feb 19 Feb 18 Feb 17 Feb 16 Feb 15 Feb 14 Feb 13 Feb 12 Feb 11 Feb 10 Feb 9 Feb 8 Feb 7 Feb 6 Feb 5 Feb 4 Feb 3 Feb 2 Feb 1 Jan 31 Jan 30 Jan 29 Jan 28 Jan 27 Jan 26 Jan 25 Jan 24 Jan 23 Jan 22 Jan 21 Jan 20 Jan 19 Jan 18 Jan 17 Jan 16 Jan 15 Jan 14 Jan 13 Jan 12 Jan 11 Jan 10 Jan 9 Jan 8
Windows 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 2
OS X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 1 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1
Linux 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1

Readme

Source
raw.​githubusercontent.​com

IDL syntax highlighting

This package provides a simple IDL (Microsoft midl, Mozilla WebIDL) syntax highlighting, derived from Sublime's standard C++ highlighting. It provides you with correct symbol detection, which was the main reason to create this.

No fancy stuff here, no additional functionality, no snippets

Note about Scopes

(This is only due to the use of Textmate Syntax highlighting which seems to have a worldwide global namespace. It has little effect to the end user.)

This file was primarily intended for highlighting MS IDL files (used by Windows COM Interfaces). But people seem to be more interested in highlighting webIDL Files, where this file seems to work too. Because of a namespace glitch in I was asked to rename the scope of this syntax highlighting and did so. Scope is now source.webidl.

Because I'm not willing to maintain two files this new scopename does also apply to MS IDL files in future. This is not completely correct, but does not have any influence on the functionality in regard of MS IDL files. Except you wrote your own extensions for this scope. In this case, you need to modify them to match the new scope. Or just let me know, maybe we can have a solution for both sides.